skip to primary navigationskip to content
 

Paper 8: Greek and Roman Philosophy

Aims and objectives

  1. To introduce the variety and scope of ancient philosophy within its historical and cultural context.
  2. To introduce current techniques of philosophical analysis.
  3. To enable students to evaluate sympathetically philosophical positions and arguments with which they may not agree.
  4. To sketch the importance of classical philosophy for the entire Western intellectual tradition.

 

Scope and structure of the examination paper 2018–19

The paper will be divided into two sections. Section A will contain in the region of 7 questions on the set text (currently: Plato, Republic 473c11–535a1). Section B will contain questions (to give a total in the region of 20 in all) covering topics falling within each of the following four areas:

  1. Early Greek philosophy on principles, being, and change.
  2. Plato’s views on psychology as developed in such dialogues as Republic, Protagoras, Phaedrus and Timaeus.
  3. Aristotle - soul, causes, happiness, and the Categories.
  4. Stoics, Epicureans, and sceptics on the good life, knowledge, and fate.

Candidates will be expected to answer three questions of which at least one, and not more than two, must be from Section A.

 

Course descriptions

PARMENIDES TO DEMOCRITUS

MR N DENYER
(8 L: Michaelmas)

Parmenides’ poem denies the possibility of ‘what is not’, and therefore, he thinks, also of any change and plurality. We will begin by examining Parmenides’ argument, perhaps the earliest Greek example of sustained deductive reasoning. We will continue by looking at the arguments that Zeno devised to show that those who rejected Parmenides’ argument were committed to no less paradoxical claims about the possibility of plurality and motion. Then we will consider responses to Parmenides by later philosophers who wanted to revive the business of cosmology, in particular Empedocles, Anaxagoras, and Democritus. We will consider how these thinkers approached questions such as the nature of reality and the possibility of humans acquiring knowledge of it.

It is recommended that you consult A.A. Long (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy (1999), J. Warren, Presocratics (2007), and G.S. Kirk, J.E. Raven & M. Schofield, The Presocratic Philosophers (1983, 2nd ed.).

 

HELLENISTIC AND ROMAN PHILOSOPHY: KNOWLEDGE AND FATE

DR M HATZIMICHALI
(8 L: Michaelmas)

This course will consider two sets of fundamental philosophical questions. (1) Can we attain knowledge of the world? If so, how? If not, why not? And what sort of life, if any, could we ever live without knowledge and beliefs? (2) Are our actions really free? Or is everything, including our own deliberations, already determined and fated? In eight lectures we will discuss how the main Hellenistic philosophical schools and tendencies posed (and, in some cases, even devised) these questions and tried to answer them, engaging in an exciting debate in which the rival positions constantly influenced and challenged one other.

These lectures are intended to cover the main material relevant to this part of section B of Paper 8.

Most of the main texts and translations, supplemented by extensive comments, are contained in the two volumes of A.A. Long, D.N. Sedley, The Hellenistic Philosophers, Cambridge: CUP, 1987. You can familiarise yourself with the protagonists of this course by reading at least the introduction of The Hellenistic Philosophers and the relevant sections of The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics (chs. 3, 5, 6, 7), The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism (chs. 5 and 8), and The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism (chs. 3–6, 7, 8, 11). The monumental The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy (Cambridge: CUP, 1999) contains up to date discussions of most of the themes we will deal with (cf., in particular, chs. 7–11, 14–17).

See also ‘Cicero: Ethics and Politics’ under Part 1B, Paper 6.

 

ARISTOTLE

MR N DENYER
(8 L: Lent)

Dante called him ‘the master of them that know’; Aquinas called him simply ‘the philosopher’; and Plato ‘the mind’. In these necessarily selective lectures we will look at some important highlights from the thought of Aristotle, including the Categories as well as his theories on causes, soul-and-body and happiness. The Part I philosophy experience cannot be complete without an introduction to the deviser of the most comprehensive, systematic and durable philosophy ever known in intellectual history. At the same time, these lectures are also intended to supply important background for those going on to take philosophy papers in Part II. A good way to get a taste before you start is to read Jonathan Barnes, Aristotle: a very short introduction (Oxford University Press), originally in the Past Masters series.

 

PLATO, REPUBLIC 473–535

PROF. J WARREN
(12 L: Lent)

Plato's Republic 473–535 is the central section of the central work by the central figure in the history of philosophy. Republic 473 announces Socrates’ great paradoxical claim: cities and humans generally will never be free from misery until either philosophers become kings or our present rulers become proper philosophers.

The following sixty Stephanus pages introduce a sequence of brilliant arguments and images designed to defend that claim. Along the way we learn what true political expertise involves and how it might be acquired. We also delve into some very basic questions about the nature of reality and knowledge.

The best advance reading is the text itself. For Greek with commentary, use Slings’ OCT and James Adam's old but wonderful two-volume edition (CUP, second, revised, edition, 1963). For a translation use Paul Shorey's Loeb. On account of the dialogue's length, we concentrate on only a selection, albeit the central core; those who read the rest of the Republic, at least in translation, will be exposed to a wealth of additional exciting material, and enjoy a considerable advantage.

 

INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHICAL METHOD

PROF. G BETEGH
PROF. J WARREN
(4 L: Easter)

These four lectures will offer some essential tools and guidance for Classics students taking Part IB paper 8 and will provide important preparation for all the second-year courses, including the set text.  They will introduce some of the major areas of philosophical interest and explain some of the jargon that students will encounter.  Above all, they are designed to show what is involved in thinking about and evaluating a philosophical argument, particularly those found in ancient philosophical texts of various kinds.

 

EARLY GREEK PHILOSOPHY AND SCIENCE

MR N DENYER
(8 L: Easter)

We will look at the debates of early Greek thinkers - including mathematicians and medics and astronomers, as well as philosophers narrowly construed - about the nature, structure and origins of the world in which we live, and about the proper ways in which to deal with such questions. 

Advance reading: G.E.R. Lloyd, Early Greek Science: Thales to Aristotle; R. McKirahan, Philosophy Before Socrates (2nd edition); A.A. Long (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy.

RSS Feed Latest news

Rebecca Flemming co-edits 'field defining' new book

Dec 11, 2018

This book 'is the first to encompass the vast history of how living things procreate, from the banks of the ancient Nile to the fertility clinics of today.'

Ingo Gildenhard and John Henderson's new publication

Dec 11, 2018

The new course book on Virgil, Aeneid 11 (Pallas & Camilla) includes Latin text, study aids with vocabulary, and commentary.

2019 Outreach event list

Nov 22, 2018

We have now released details of the Outreach events that the Faculty of Classics that will be hosting or participating in during 2019.

Leverhulme Early Career Fellowships at Cambridge

Nov 07, 2018

The Cambridge Classics Faculty invites applications to the 2019 round of the Leverhulme Trust early Career Fellowship competition.

View all news