skip to primary navigationskip to content

Paper 9: Classical Art and Archaeology

Aims and objectives

  1. To introduce the range and variety of Greek and Roman archaeology and art, and the types of evidence available, expanding the knowledge acquired in 1A.
  2. To introduce the general principles of archaeology, as applied to the Greek and Roman worlds.
  3. To explore the ways in which iconography in the ancient world has been studied in modern times, and how this integrates with other archaeological approaches to ancient societies.


Scope and structure of the examination paper 2019–20

The syllabus is based around the following topics: (i) Visual narratives; (ii) Us and Them; (iii) From Palaces to the Polis; (iv) Mycenae - City of Legend?

Candidates must answer three questions, including Question 1. Question 1 will contain a choice of four pairs of images for comment, one pair corresponding to each of the topics taught in the year; candidates must answer on three images, no more than one image per pair. There will also be two essay questions corresponding to each of the topics taught in the year. All questions carry equal weight.


Course descriptions


(8 L: Michaelmas)

Story-telling is coventionally associated with words, in oral and written communication. Yet today stories are mostly relayed by images, or image-dominated media. Was this also true in antiquity? Beginning with an introductory survey of narrative art in societies with zero or restricted literacy, and (for those who need it) a brief immersion in the depths of narrative theory, this course traces a ‘story’ of visual story-telling from Geometric Greece to the Antonine period of the Roman empire. The order of lectures is chronological, with certain general questions addressed alongside a series of case-studies. Is the ‘naturalism’ of Classical art due to the graphically descriptive style of Homeric epic? Should ‘art’ and ‘text’ be considered as (rival) siblings, or as occupying ‘parallel worlds’? Must every story have a beginning, middle and end? Does the Hollywood formula (Joseph Campbell et al.) arise from Classical codification – or cross-cultural practice?

Students intending to follow the course should prepare themselves by looking at Aristotle’s Poetics, and some primer of ‘narratology’, e.g. D. Herman, Basic Elements of Narrative (Wiley-Blackwell 2009) or M-L. Ryan ed., Narrative across Media: The Languages of Storytelling (Nebraska 2004). For the sort of case-studies we will be addressing, see R. Brilliant, Visual Narratives (Cornell 1986), and P.J. Holliday ed., Narrative and Event in Ancient Art (Cambridge 1993).



(8 L: Michaelmas)

The wondrous achievements of Roman architecture and the lavish expenditure in works of art that came along with it still lie before our very eyes. When one considers, however, that atmospheric pollution levels at the height of the Roman Empire could rival those of the early Industrial Revolution, that Roman trade extended far across the Indian Ocean and that the city of Rome harboured a population of a million people, it becomes clear that this must have been the result of quite a unique combination of specific conditions. Indeed archaeology suggests that similar patterns had not occurred before and – most importantly – were in fact not to be seen again for more than a thousand years afterwards. This awareness cannot but raise very important questions about the relationship between ‘ancient’ and ‘modern’. Acknowledging the significance and extent of actual similarities makes it even more important to properly define and explain the nature of the differences: what – if anything – made them different from us?

The aim of this course is to explore this intriguing question by critically reviewing the varied array of available evidence about the structure and performance of the Roman economy – moving dialectically between aspects of economic theory, material culture and art history. As such it will look at technological development and manufacture patterns, it will place artistic and architectural practice in its broader social-economic context, it will explore the extent of trade and supply, and it will address the issue of economic growth and relevant cultural attitudes. This journey will eventually lead us to discuss to what extent and in precisely what terms the insights we derive about the modern economy can be effectively used to illuminate the Roman one… and vice-versa.

Preliminary readings: K. Greene (1986), The Archaeology of the Roman Economy (London); W. Harris (2015), Prolegomena to a study of the economics of Roman Art, in American Journal of Archaeology 119.3: 395-417; C. Marcone (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Art and Architecture (Oxford) [107-414]; B. Russell (2013), The Economics of the Roman Stone Trade (Cambridge); W. Scheidel, I. Morris and R. Saller (eds.) (2007), The Cambridge Economic History of the Greco-Roman World (Cambridge) [1-171, 485-768]; W. Scheidel (ed.) (2012), The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Economy (Cambridge); A. Wilson (2006), The economic impact of technological advances in the Roman construction industry, in E. Lo Cascio (ed.), Innovazione Tecnica e Progresso Economico nel Mondo Romano (Bari), 225-236.



(8 L: Lent)

This course looks at the decline and fall of the Mycenaean palaces and what comes next. Is it really a Dark Age? How do people cope with the collapse of a complex hierarchical society, and what new ways of living in the shadow of the palaces emerge? Finally, how when and why do new complex societies emerge in the shape of the polis? We will look at a wide variety of evidence  (archaeological, visual material and texts such as the Homeric epic) in an attempt to shed light on this period: a period which is so important for understanding emergence of Classical Greece.

Initial reading: A.M. Snodgrass The Dark Age of Greece (1971); R. Osborne Greece in the Making 1200-479 BC (1996); J. Whitley The Archaeology of Ancient Greece (2001).



(8 L: Easter)

Mycenae is one of the most important cities of the ancient world. Following the excavations and dazzling discoveries there of Heinrich Schliemann, Mycenae became one of the most important type-sites for the archaeology of the Bronze Age Aegean, paving the way for the systematic exploration of Greece's rich pre-classical past. Known in Homer as 'rich in gold' and immortalised in ancient Greek literature as the capital of Agamemnon, Mycenae has long been vested in a legendary aura.

This course examines in detail the site's history, art and archaeology from its earliest Neolithic beginnings down to its modern rediscovery. Among the aims of the course is to familiarise students with sources, methods, and tools available to us today that can help us reconstruct and understand the history and significance of a site over time.

As part of the course we will explore the identity and power base of Mycenae's elite, through exploring high status artefacts, monumental architecture, iconography, and evidence for cult activity. The 'shaft graves' as well as Mycenae's palace, administration and industries are discussed, along with the few – yet highly informative – Linear B documents. The modern rediscovery of Mycenae by the western world is set alongside Schliemann's methods and practices and the impact his work had on modern scholarship, especially with regard to understanding Greece's Bronze Age past.

With the Museum of Classical Archaeology holding the Mycenae Excavations Archive and remarkable collections of Mycenaean pots and sherds, one of the lectures is used for a handling session of actual objects and archival material, bringing you closer to the people in the past and to the work of the archaeologists in the present.

Preliminary reading: E. French, Mycenae. Agamemnon's Capital (Stroud, 2002); Gere, C. The Tomb of Agamemnon: Mycenae and the Search for a Hero (London, 2006); Wardle, K.A. and D. Wardle, Cities of Legend. The Mycenaean World (Bristol, 2001 repr.); C. Shelmerdine, The Cambridge Companion to the Aegean Bronze Age (Cambridge, 2008).

RSS Feed Latest news

Cambridge Classical Studies Series & Gold Open Access

Jul 01, 2020

The Faculty of Classics is delighted to have reached an agreement with Cambridge University Press by which, for the next three years, five volumes a year in the Cambridge Classical Studies Series (monographs on Classical topics written by academics working in or recently trained in Cambridge) will be published Gold Open Access without charge to the author or the Faculty. This is a significant initiative, designed to maximise the impact of the excellent Classical research being done in Cambridge.

Virtual Open Days 2-3 July 2020

Jun 29, 2020

Check out our new Virtual Hub for the latest online content from Cambridge Classics, including links to this week's Virtual Open Days for prospective undergraduates

Mapping Falerii Novi, Italy

Jun 09, 2020

For the first time, archaeologists have succeeded in mapping a complete Roman city, Falerii Novi in Italy, using advanced ground penetrating radar (GPR), allowing them to reveal astonishing details while it remains deep underground. The technology could revolutionise our understanding of ancient settlements.

Teaching Associate in Classics

Jun 05, 2020

Details of how to apply for this part time fixed term teaching post are now avilable online. Deadline Monday 6th July 2020.

View all news